Equivalent expressions
Factoring, expanding, exponent rules, and completing the square when the form matters.
~32 min · prequestion, worked examples, retrieval practice
Equivalent-expression questions never ask you to simplify — they ask you to choose the form that makes the answer visible, and the four choices are usually all correct algebra pointing at different facts. A quadratic has three faces, and each one hands you one thing for free: where it crosses the y-axis, where it crosses the x-axis, or where it bottoms out. Pick the wrong face and you do three minutes of work to reach something the right face was displaying the whole time.
Before you read on
Two or three questions on exactly what this lesson teaches. Being wrong here is fine — it's the fastest way to find out what to pay attention to next.
Before any teaching: you need the minimum value of f(x) = 2x² − 12x + 23. Which single rewriting hands you that value with no further work?
Before any teaching: for x > 0, the expression (2x³)⁴ / (4x⁵) is equivalent to which of the following?
Before any teaching: exactly one of these is true for every value of x at which the left-hand side is defined. Which one?
What the question is actually testing
Advanced Math is about 35 percent of the Math section — 13 to 15 of the 44 questions — which ties it with Algebra for the largest domain. That weighting is College Board's own, from the published assessment framework. How those questions divide across the domain's three skill points is not published; prep-industry counts put Equivalent Expressions at roughly a third of them. Treat the 35 percent as official and the split as an estimate.
What distinguishes this skill point is that most of its items carry no story. No gym membership, no rideshare fare — symbols on a screen and an instruction to find an equivalent form. That makes them fast when you know the moves and unbounded when you do not, which is a large part of why they cluster in the harder second module: the routing algorithm sends stronger performers to a module that leans on exactly the questions where knowing one pattern replaces two minutes of flailing.
The instruction is almost never "simplify." It is "which of the following is equivalent to the given expression," or "which equivalent form displays the minimum as a constant," or "the expression is equivalent to ax + b, what is a + b." Those look like three tasks and are one: what am I allowed to do to this expression that does not change what it is worth?
So state the definition once, because it is also a method. Two expressions are equivalent when they produce the same value at every input where both are defined. Not "look similar," not "reduce to something shorter." If two expressions disagree at even one legal input, they are not equivalent — and a single substitution can prove it in fifteen seconds. Hold onto that; it comes back as the most valuable habit in the lesson.
Foundations — the algebra underneath, from zero (skip this block if you can factor 6x² + 5x − 4 without pausing)
Everything in this lesson is a rearrangement of four things: expanding, factoring, exponent rules, and fractions. If any one of the four is shaky, the rest of the lesson reads as a list of tricks to memorise rather than a small set of moves. This block builds all four from nothing, in plain language. A reader who already has them should skip to the next block — nothing later depends on having read this one.
Expanding. Every term in the first bracket multiplies every term in the second, and nothing is skipped: (2x − 3)(x + 5) = 2x·x + 2x·5 + (−3)·x + (−3)·5 = 2x² + 10x − 3x − 15 = 2x² + 7x − 15. The only thing to be careful about is that the minus sign belongs to the 3 and travels with it into both of its products. Losing that sign is the single most common arithmetic error in this entire domain.
Factoring is expanding run backwards, and four patterns cover essentially everything the Digital SAT uses. Pattern one, common factor, and always check for it first: 6x³ − 15x² = 3x²(2x − 5). Pattern two, difference of squares: a² − b² = (a − b)(a + b), so x² − 49 = (x − 7)(x + 7) and 4x² − 9 = (2x − 3)(2x + 3). A sum of squares, a² + b², does not factor over the real numbers — there is no pattern to remember because there is no pattern.
Pattern three, a trinomial with a leading coefficient of 1: x² + bx + c wants two numbers whose product is c and whose sum is b. For x² − 7x + 12 the pair is −3 and −4, so it factors as (x − 3)(x − 4). Pattern four, a trinomial with a leading coefficient other than 1 — the ac method, which is grouping. For 6x² + 5x − 4: multiply a by c to get 6 · (−4) = −24, find the pair with product −24 and sum 5, which is 8 and −3, split the middle term into those pieces, then factor in pairs. 6x² + 8x − 3x − 4 = 2x(3x + 4) − 1(3x + 4) = (2x − 1)(3x + 4). The shared bracket appearing in both halves is the confirmation that the split was right; if it does not appear, the pair was wrong.
Exponents. x⁵ means five copies of x multiplied together, and that one sentence generates every rule. Multiplying like bases piles the copies up, so x^a · x^b = x^(a+b). Dividing cancels copies off, so x^a / x^b = x^(a−b). A power of a power makes b groups of a copies, so (x^a)^b = x^(ab). An exponent on a product reaches every factor: (xy)^a = x^a · y^a, which is why the 2 in (2x³)⁴ gets raised too.
The extensions follow from the same rules rather than being new facts. x⁰ = 1, because x^a / x^a is both 1 and x⁰. x^(−a) = 1/x^a, because x^a · x^(−a) = x⁰ = 1. x^(1/n) is the nth root of x, because raising it to the n gives x¹. And x^(m/n) = (ⁿ√x)^m. There is one thing with no rule at all: x^a + x^b does not simplify. Exponent rules govern multiplication and division only. There is nothing to do to x³ + x⁵ except factor it as x³(1 + x²).
Fractions of expressions. A fraction bar is a division, and you may cancel only what is a factor of the entire numerator and the entire denominator. The reason is not a convention: division distributes over multiplication and does not distribute over addition. (6·5)/6 = 5, but (6 + 5)/6 is not 5. Everything that goes wrong with rational expressions on this test is a version of that one sentence being violated.
The check, which you should build now and never stop using. Substitute a number into the original and into your candidate answer, and see whether they agree. Choose x = 2 or x = 3 — never 0 and never 1, because those values make coefficients and exponents invisible, and never a value that makes a denominator zero. It costs about fifteen seconds and it catches sign errors that you have already convinced yourself are correct, which is the only kind that actually costs points.
The three forms of a quadratic, and the fact each one hands you
Standard form, f(x) = ax² + bx + c. The constant c is f(0), the y-intercept. The sign of a says which way the parabola opens: up when a is positive, down when a is negative. That is all standard form gives away for free.
Factored form, f(x) = a(x − r)(x − s). Here r and s are the zeros — where the graph meets the x-axis — because a product equals zero exactly when one of its factors does. Nothing about the vertex is visible without work.
Vertex form, f(x) = a(x − h)² + k. The vertex is (h, k), the axis of symmetry is the line x = h, and k is the minimum value when a > 0 or the maximum when a < 0. The reason is one line long: (x − h)² is never negative, so it is smallest when it is zero, which happens at x = h, and there f(x) = k. Note the sign convention that costs people points: in a(x + 4)² − 7 the value of h is −4, not 4, because x + 4 is x − (−4).
The SAT question built directly on this is phrased "which of the following equivalent forms of the given equation displays the [minimum / the zeros / the y-intercept] as a constant or coefficient?" It is not asking you to compute anything. All four choices are usually genuinely equivalent to the original — that is what makes it hard — and three of them display the wrong feature. Read which feature is asked for, name the form that displays it, and pick that shape. Doing algebra on this item type is the weak path; recognising the shape is the strong one.
One shortcut worth owning outright: the vertex's x-coordinate is always −b/(2a), read straight off standard form with no rearrangement. If a question asks only where the minimum occurs, that is a five-second answer and completing the square is the slow road. If it asks for the minimum value, either evaluate f(−b/(2a)) or complete the square — both work, and the substitution is usually faster.
Completing the square, as a procedure that never fails
Four steps, in this order. One: factor a out of the x² and x terms only, leaving the constant outside the parentheses. Two: halve the coefficient of x that is now inside, square it, and add and subtract that number inside the parentheses. Three: fold the first three terms inside into a square, and carry the subtracted number out — multiplied by a. Four: check by expanding back, or by substituting a number.
With a = 1 it is short enough to do in your head: x² + 10x + 3 → (x² + 10x + 25 − 25) + 3 → (x + 5)² − 25 + 3 → (x + 5)² − 22. Expanding back gives x² + 10x + 25 − 22 = x² + 10x + 3. ✓
Step three is where the points go when a ≠ 1. The number you subtracted is sitting inside the parentheses, so it gets multiplied by a on its way out. In 3(x² + 8x + 16 − 16) + 41, the −16 leaves as −48, not as −16 — and the difference between those two, 25 versus −7, is a wrong answer the test has written into the choices on purpose.
One more thing about the phrasing. A completing-the-square question frequently does not ask for the form at all. It asks for h, or for k, or for h + k, or for the minimum value, or for the x at which the minimum occurs. Producing a correct vertex form and then answering the wrong letter is a full-credit loss that feels, at the moment you bubble it, exactly like a win.
Rational expressions — cancelling, and what to do when nothing cancels
Factor the top and the bottom completely before touching anything, then cancel only whole factors that appear on both. If nothing factors, nothing cancels: the expression is already in lowest terms no matter how much it looks like it ought to shrink. "It looks like it should simplify" is the feeling that produces cancelling across a sum, which is the most punished error in this domain.
Cancelling changes the domain, and the test knows it. (x² − 9)/(x − 3) equals x + 3 everywhere except at x = 3, where the original is undefined and x + 3 is 6. That is why these items carry the phrase "for all x ≠ 3" or "where both expressions are defined." The wrapper is not legal boilerplate — it is the test protecting the equivalence claim, and you should read it as free information. It names a zero of the denominator, which is very often the factor that cancels, which tells you what to look for on top before you start.
When the numerator does not divide evenly, the answer takes the shape quotient + remainder/divisor. Polynomial long division works and is worth being able to do. On a multiple-choice item, though, multiplying back is faster and safer: given (6x² + 5x − 1)/(2x − 1) = 3x + 4 + A/(2x − 1), multiply through by (2x − 1) to get 6x² + 5x − 1 = (2x − 1)(3x + 4) + A, then substitute any convenient x. At x = 1: 10 = (1)(7) + A, so A = 3. No division performed, no sign slips available.
Adding or subtracting rational expressions needs a common denominator, and the SAT's version is usually two fractions whose denominators are related rather than unrelated. Watch specifically for (3 − x) and (x − 3): they differ by a factor of −1, and pulling that −1 out is frequently the entire question. The same applies to (a − b) and (b − a) anywhere they appear together.
Mechanism
Why every legal move is either multiplying by 1 or adding 0
Rewriting an expression is constrained by exactly one requirement — the value at every input has to stay the same — and there are only two ways to change how something looks without changing what it is worth: multiply it by something that equals 1, or add something that equals 0. Every technique in this lesson is one of those two wearing a disguise. Building a common denominator multiplies a fraction by (x + 2)/(x + 2), which is 1. Rationalising a denominator multiplies by conjugate-over-conjugate, which is 1. Cancelling a common factor f divides top and bottom by f, which is multiplying the fraction by (1/f)/(1/f), which is 1. Completing the square adds and subtracts the same number — adding 0, written as 9 − 9 so that part of it can be folded into a square. Once you can see which of the two a move is, you can tell instantly whether it is legal. "Cancelling the x in (x + 3)/(x + 7)" is neither: it deletes a term, which is not multiplying by 1 and not adding 0, and it changes the value. This also explains the domain restriction that trails every cancellation. The disguised 1 you multiplied by, (1/f)/(1/f), is only equal to 1 where f ≠ 0. So the equivalence holds everywhere except there — and the restriction is not an afterthought bolted onto the answer, it is a record of which disguised 1 you used.
Worked examples
Fully worked — completing the square with a leading coefficient
- 01Problem: rewrite f(x) = 2x² − 12x + 23 in the form a(x − h)² + k, and state the minimum value of f.
- 02Step 1 — factor a out of the x² and x terms only, leaving the constant where it is: f(x) = 2(x² − 6x) + 23. The 23 stays outside; dragging it inside is the first place this goes wrong.
- 03Step 2 — halve the coefficient of x now inside the parentheses: −6/2 = −3. Square it: 9. Add and subtract 9 inside: f(x) = 2(x² − 6x + 9 − 9) + 23. Nothing has changed, because 9 − 9 is 0.
- 04Step 3 — fold the first three terms inside into a square and carry the −9 out, multiplied by the 2: f(x) = 2((x − 3)² − 9) + 23 = 2(x − 3)² − 18 + 23 = 2(x − 3)² + 5. The −9 became −18 on the way out. That multiplication is the step the test writes a distractor against.
- 05Step 4 — check by expanding back: 2(x − 3)² + 5 = 2(x² − 6x + 9) + 5 = 2x² − 12x + 18 + 5 = 2x² − 12x + 23. ✓ Matches the original exactly.
- 06Step 5 — read the answer off the form. The vertex is (3, 5). Since a = 2 > 0 the parabola opens upward, so 5 is a minimum, not a maximum. The minimum value of f is 5, and it occurs at x = 3. Cross-check with the shortcut: −b/(2a) = 12/4 = 3. ✓
One step hidden — simplifying a rational expression
- 01Problem: simplify (2x² + 5x − 12)/(x² − 16), and state the values of x for which the simplification does not apply.
- 02Step 1 — factor the numerator with the ac method. ac = 2 · (−12) = −24; the pair with product −24 and sum 5 is 8 and −3. Split and group: 2x² + 8x − 3x − 12 = 2x(x + 4) − 3(x + 4) = (2x − 3)(x + 4). The shared bracket confirms the split.
- 03Step 2 — factor the denominator as a difference of squares: x² − 16 = (x − 4)(x + 4).
- 04Step 3 — cancel (x + 4). This is legal because it is a factor of the whole numerator and a factor of the whole denominator — not a term inside either. Note what could not be cancelled: nothing else appears on both sides.
Two steps hidden — fractional exponents
- 01Problem: for x > 0, write (16x⁸)^(3/4) / (2x⁻¹) in the form cx^n.
- 02Step 1 — distribute the outer exponent over the product inside the parentheses: (16x⁸)^(3/4) = 16^(3/4) · (x⁸)^(3/4). The exponent reaches the 16 as well as the x.
- 03Step 2 — evaluate each piece. Write 16 as 2⁴, so 16^(3/4) = 2^(4 · 3/4) = 2³ = 8. And (x⁸)^(3/4) = x^(8 · 3/4) = x⁶. The numerator is 8x⁶.
Solve alone
- 01Problem: the expression (3x² + 11x − 4)/(x + 4) is equivalent to ax + b for every x ≠ −4, where a and b are constants. What is the value of a + b? Work it completely before revealing anything below.
In your own words
In one sentence: in step 2 of the first worked example, why does adding 9 and subtracting 9 inside the parentheses leave the expression's value unchanged — and why does that subtracted 9 leave the parentheses as −18 rather than as −9?
Named traps
- Cancelling across a sum
- Striking a symbol that appears on both sides of a fraction bar without checking that it is a factor of the whole side rather than a term inside a sum. (x + 3)/(x + 7) is finished; there is nothing to cancel. The test writes whole answer choices out of this error, because it produces a shorter, cleaner-looking expression, and shorter feels like progress. Rule: if the top or the bottom still has a plus or minus sign that is not inside a bracket, you have not factored yet, and until you have factored you cannot cancel anything.
- The forgotten coefficient
- Raising the variable to the outer power and leaving the number alone: (3x⁴)³ read as 3x¹² instead of 27x¹². An exponent on a product reaches every factor inside the parentheses, coefficients included. The same slip in reverse gives (2x)² = 2x² instead of 4x².
- Add/multiply exponent swap
- Adding exponents where the rule multiplies, or the reverse: (x⁴)³ read as x⁷, or x⁴ · x³ read as x¹². The distinction is worth saying in words rather than symbols — multiplying like bases piles copies up, so the counts add; a power of a power makes several identical groups of copies, so the counts multiply. The same confusion produces adding on division, which turns x¹²/x⁵ into x¹⁷.
- The half-completed square
- Completing the square correctly and then failing to multiply the subtracted number by the leading coefficient on its way out of the parentheses — writing 3(x + 4)² + 41 − 16 instead of 3(x + 4)² + 41 − 48. Occurs only when a ≠ 1, which is exactly when the test uses it, and it produces a wrong constant that sits in the answer choices looking entirely reasonable.
- Phantom factorisation
- Applying a pattern that does not exist, or stopping halfway through one that does. x² + 25 does not factor over the reals. (x + 4)² is x² + 8x + 16, not x² + 16. And x⁴ − 16 is a difference of squares whose first factor is another difference of squares: (x² − 4)(x² + 4) = (x − 2)(x + 2)(x² + 4). Stopping at the first step is a real answer choice on "completely factored" items.
- Answering the wrong letter
- Correct algebra, wrong quantity handed in. The item asks for a + b and gets a; asks for k and gets h; asks for the minimum value and gets the x where it occurs; asks for the value of the constant and gets the value of x. This trap does not test algebra at all, which is precisely why it survives at the top of the score range — it catches people whose work was right.
The 800-level margin
If you can already factor, expand, and complete the square without hesitating and are still dropping one or two Advanced Math questions per test, the remaining errors are almost never conceptual. They are five hard variants and four execution slips. Nothing below is a new technique — that is the point of the list.
Hard variant one — the form question, where every choice is genuinely equivalent. "Which of the following equivalent forms displays the minimum value of the function as a constant or coefficient?" All four expand back to the same thing, so verifying equivalence tells you nothing. The decision is entirely about which feature each shape displays: vertex form for a maximum or minimum, factored form for zeros or x-intercepts, standard form for the y-intercept. Read the feature asked for first, before you read a single choice, and the item becomes a shape-match rather than an algebra problem.
Hard variant two — identities with unknown constants. "(2x + 5)(3x − k) = 6x² − x − 40 for all values of x." The words "for all values of x" convert this from an equation to solve into an identity to match: expand the left, then set the coefficient of x² equal to the coefficient of x², the coefficient of x equal to the coefficient of x, and the constant equal to the constant. Two independent equations usually fall out, and if only one unknown exists, one of them is a free check on the other. The alternative — substitute two convenient values of x and solve the resulting system — is faster when the expansion is ugly, and it is exactly as valid.
Hard variant three — the excluded-value wrapper as a hint. "For all x ≠ 3" or "where both expressions are defined" is not decoration and not a caveat; it names a zero of the denominator. Nine times out of ten that same binomial is a factor of the numerator, which means the question has told you what to factor before you have started. Strong students read the restriction as legal fine print and skip it. It is free information.
Hard variant four — radicals, and the absolute-value hazard. Convert radicals to fractional exponents on sight: √x = x^(1/2), ∛(x⁴) = x^(4/3), 1/√x = x^(−1/2). Once everything is an exponent, one rule set covers the whole expression. The hazard: √(x²) = |x|, not x, because the radical symbol denotes the non-negative root. The SAT usually defuses this by stipulating x > 0 somewhere in the stem — which means the moment you see an item that does not stipulate it, the sign is very likely the point of the question. Read the stem for that condition before you start simplifying, not after.
Hard variant five — division with a remainder. When the numerator does not divide evenly, the answer has the form quotient + remainder/divisor, and the question usually asks for one constant inside it. Do not long-divide unless you have to. Multiply both sides by the divisor to clear the fraction, then substitute a value of x that kills the messy term — for (…)/(2x − 1), substituting x = 1/2 makes the quotient term vanish and hands you the remainder in one line. That trick generalises: the value that zeroes the divisor is always the fastest substitution.
Execution slips, in the order they cost points. First, the distributed minus sign that reaches only the first term: −(x² − 3x + 2) becoming −x² − 3x + 2. Write the bracket out before you distribute; on a screen with no scratch discipline this is the most expensive habit on the section. Second, the sign of h in vertex form — a(x + 4)² has h = −4 — and the sign of the constant that leaves the parentheses when a ≠ 1. Third, answering the wrong letter: circle the quantity actually requested in the stem before you begin, because after two minutes of correct algebra the pull toward handing in the number you just computed is strong. Fourth, over-simplifying past the answer, or under-simplifying short of it: the choices define the target form, so look at them before deciding how far to go.
The habit that converts, and the reason this skill point is the cheapest place on the test to buy points: substitute a number. On any "which of the following is equivalent" item, pick x = 2 or 3 — never 0, never 1, never an excluded value — evaluate the original once, then evaluate choices until one matches. If two match, try a second value. This is not a fallback for when the algebra fails; on ugly items it is the faster path, and it is immune to every sign error in the trap list above. The Bluebook app has the Desmos graphing calculator built into both Math modules, which is College Board's own tooling rather than a workaround, so on a form question you can graph the original and a candidate and see whether the curves coincide.
Time. Each Math module is 22 questions in 35 minutes — about 95 seconds per question, which is arithmetic on College Board's published module structure rather than advice from anyone. The recommendation is Meridian's: equivalent-expression items should run well under that average, because the substitution check makes them verifiable rather than merely attempted, and the time they save is what funds the geometry and data questions later in the module that genuinely need two minutes.
Retrieval — with feedback on every choice
Which expression is equivalent to (3x⁴y)³ / (9x⁵y⁻²), where x and y are positive?
EQUIVALENT EXPRESSIONS — reference card Equivalent = same value at every input where both are defined. Prove it or break it by substituting x = 2 (never 0, never 1, never an excluded value). Exponents: x^a·x^b = x^(a+b); x^a/x^b = x^(a-b); (x^a)^b = x^(ab); (xy)^a = x^a·y^a. x^0 = 1; x^(-a) = 1/x^a; x^(1/n) = nth root of x; x^(m/n) = (nth root of x)^m. The outer exponent hits the coefficient too: (3x^4)^3 = 27x^12, not 3x^12. x^a + x^b never simplifies. Exponent rules govern multiplication and division only. Factor in this order: common factor -> difference of squares -> trinomial -> ac-method grouping. a^2 - b^2 = (a-b)(a+b). a^2 + b^2 does NOT factor over the reals. (x+4)^2 = x^2+8x+16, not x^2+16. Cancel FACTORS, never terms. If a plus or minus is still loose on either side, you have not finished factoring. Three forms: standard ax^2+bx+c shows the y-intercept c; factored a(x-r)(x-s) shows the zeros; vertex a(x-h)^2+k shows the vertex (h,k) and the min/max k. Vertex x-coordinate straight off standard form: x = -b/(2a). Sign of h: a(x+4)^2 has h = -4. Completing the square with a != 1: factor a out of the x-terms FIRST; the number subtracted inside leaves multiplied by a. 'Equivalent for all x except c' names a zero of the denominator — and usually the factor that cancels. Free information. Remainder form: multiply both sides by the divisor, then substitute the x that zeroes it. Radicals to fractional exponents on sight. sqrt(x^2) = |x| — check whether the stem stipulates x > 0. Answer the letter asked: a+b is not a; k is not h; the minimum VALUE is not where it occurs.
Every item on this page is Meridian-original, written to match the Digital SAT's format and difficulty — it is not a real SAT question. The only source that matches the live test exactly is College Board's own Bluebook and Question Bank.
Which expression is equivalent to (3x⁴y)³ / (9x⁵y⁻²), where x and y are positive?
- 3x⁷y⁵
Correct. The outer exponent reaches every factor: (3x⁴y)³ = 3³ · x¹² · y³ = 27x¹²y³. Then divide: 27/9 = 3, x¹²/x⁵ = x⁷, and y³/y⁻² = y³⁻⁽⁻²⁾ = y⁵. Check at x = y = 2: numerator (3·16·2)³ = 96³ = 884,736; denominator 9 · 32 · (1/4) = 72; 884,736/72 = 12,288. And 3 · 2⁷ · 2⁵ = 3 · 128 · 32 = 12,288. ✓
- B3x²y⁵
This comes from (x⁴)³ = x⁷ — adding the exponents where a power of a power multiplies them. With x⁷ upstairs instead of x¹², the division leaves x⁷⁻⁵ = x², which is where this value comes from. Everything else in the choice is handled correctly, which is what makes it convincing.
- Cx⁷y⁵/3
This raises the variables and leaves the 3 alone, reading (3x⁴y)³ as 3x¹²y³. The coefficient then divides as 3/9 = 1/3 rather than 27/9 = 3. The powers of x and y are both correct here, so the only defect is the coefficient — which is exactly why it is easy to sign off on.
- D3x⁷y
This treats y³ / y⁻² as y³⁻² = y¹ — subtracting 2 instead of subtracting negative 2. Dividing by y⁻² is multiplying by y², so the exponents add to 5. The negative exponent in a denominator flips to positive when it comes up top.
Traps tested: Exponent op swap · Forgotten coefficient · Negative exponent sign slip
The expression (x² − 2x − 35)/(x² − 49) is equivalent to which of the following for all values of x for which both expressions are defined?
- (x + 5)/(x + 7)
Correct. The numerator factors as (x − 7)(x + 5): the pair with product −35 and sum −2 is −7 and +5. The denominator is a difference of squares, (x − 7)(x + 7). Cancelling the shared factor (x − 7) leaves (x + 5)/(x + 7). Check at x = 2: the original is (4 − 4 − 35)/(4 − 49) = −35/−45 = 7/9, and (2 + 5)/(2 + 7) = 7/9. ✓
- B(x + 5)/(x − 7)
This cancels the (x − 7) on top against the (x + 7) on the bottom — treating the two "seven factors" as the same object because they share a 7. They are not equal, and cancelling requires identical factors, sign included. Substituting x = 2 gives 7/(−5) = −1.4 against the original's 7/9 ≈ 0.78, which are not even the same sign.
- C(x − 5)/(x − 7)
This comes from factoring the numerator as (x + 7)(x − 5) and then cancelling (x + 7). But (x + 7)(x − 5) expands to x² + 2x − 35, and the numerator given is x² − 2x − 35 — the middle term's sign is wrong, so the pair chosen was +7 and −5 rather than −7 and +5. Expanding your factorisation back is a five-second check that catches this every time.
- D(2x + 35)/49
This strikes the x² off the top and the bottom, which is the classic cancellation across a sum: x² is a term in each expression, not a factor of either, so it cannot be divided out on its own. Substituting x = 2 gives (4 + 35)/49 = 39/49 ≈ 0.796 against the original's 7/9 ≈ 0.778 — close enough to look right at a glance, which is the danger.
Traps tested: Sign blind cancellation · Sign slip in factoring · Cancel across sum
The function f is defined by f(x) = 3x² + 24x + 41. What is the minimum value of f(x)?
- −7
Correct. Factor 3 out of the x-terms: 3(x² + 8x) + 41. Half of 8 is 4, and 4² = 16, so add and subtract 16 inside: 3(x² + 8x + 16 − 16) + 41 = 3(x + 4)² − 48 + 41 = 3(x + 4)² − 7. Since a = 3 > 0 the minimum is −7, at x = −4. Direct check: f(−4) = 3(16) + 24(−4) + 41 = 48 − 96 + 41 = −7. ✓
- B−4
−4 is where the minimum occurs, not what the minimum is — it is the x-coordinate of the vertex, obtainable in one step as −b/(2a) = −24/6 = −4. The question asks for the value of f(x) at that point, which requires the second step of substituting it back in.
- C25
This is completing the square correctly and then failing to multiply the subtracted 16 by the leading coefficient on its way out of the parentheses: 3(x + 4)² + 41 − 16 = 25 instead of 3(x + 4)² + 41 − 48 = −7. The 16 was subtracted inside the parentheses, so it leaves as 3 · 16 = 48.
- D41
41 is the constant term, which is f(0) — the y-intercept, not the minimum. Those coincide only when the vertex sits on the y-axis, which happens only when b = 0. Here b = 24, so the vertex has been shifted left and the function drops well below 41.
Traps tested: Wrong quantity answered · Half completed square · Constant term as minimum
(2x + 5)(3x − k) = 6x² − x − 40 for all values of x, where k is a constant. What is the value of k?
- 8
Correct. Expand the left side: 6x² − 2kx + 15x − 5k = 6x² + (15 − 2k)x − 5k. Because the equality holds for all x, match term by term. Constants: −5k = −40, so k = 8. The x-terms then give a free confirmation: 15 − 2(8) = −1, which matches the −x in the target. Check by expanding: (2x + 5)(3x − 8) = 6x² − 16x + 15x − 40 = 6x² − x − 40. ✓
- B−8
This comes from a sign slip in one of two places: reading the last product as +5k so that 5k = −40, or distributing (3x − k) as if the minus belonged to the 3x. Test it — (2x + 5)(3x + 8) = 6x² + 31x + 40, which has the wrong sign on both the x-term and the constant. Substituting a single value of x into the candidate would have caught this in one line.
- C40
This treats the constant term of the product as just −k, giving −k = −40, and so ignores that the −k is multiplied by the 5 in the first bracket. In a product of two binomials the constant term is always the product of the two constants, here 5 · (−k) = −5k.
- D1/2
This uses only the outer product to build the x-term, setting −2k = −1, and drops the inner product 5 · 3x = 15x. Both cross-products contribute to the middle term; the full coefficient is 15 − 2k, not −2k. Expanding all four products every time, even when one looks ignorable, is what prevents this.
Traps tested: Sign slip on constant term · Partial expansion · Ignored inner product
The expression (6x² + 5x − 1)/(2x − 1) is equivalent to 3x + 4 + A/(2x − 1) for all x ≠ 1/2, where A is a constant. What is the value of A?
- A−1
This takes the numerator's constant term, −1, as the remainder. The remainder is what is left after (2x − 1)(3x + 4) has been subtracted from the numerator, not a term copied out of it. Substituting x = 1 into the given identity would have exposed it immediately: the left side is 10, and 3 + 4 + (−1) = 6.
- 3
Correct. Multiply both sides by (2x − 1): 6x² + 5x − 1 = (2x − 1)(3x + 4) + A. Expand the product: 6x² + 8x − 3x − 4 = 6x² + 5x − 4. So A = (6x² + 5x − 1) − (6x² + 5x − 4) = 3. Faster route, no expansion needed: substitute x = 1 into the original identity — the left side is (6 + 5 − 1)/(2 − 1) = 10, and the right side is 3 + 4 + A/1 = 7 + A, so A = 3. ✓
- C−3
The magnitude is right and the subtraction was performed in the wrong order: (2x − 1)(3x + 4) minus the numerator, rather than the numerator minus the product. −4 − (−1) = −3 instead of −1 − (−4) = 3. Substituting x = 1 settles the direction: 10 = 7 + A forces A to be positive.
- D−5
This comes from the last subtraction in long division being done as an addition: after 4(2x − 1) = 8x − 4, the final step is (−1) − (−4) = 3, but computing it as (−1) + (−4) gives −5. Long division on this test is a sign-error generator; multiplying back, or substituting a value, avoids the subtraction entirely.
Traps tested: Constant term grabbed · Reversed subtraction order · Sign error in long division
Which expression is equivalent to (a⁻²b³)⁻³ / (a⁴b⁻²)², where a and b are positive?
- 1/(a²b⁵)
Correct. Numerator: (a⁻²b³)⁻³ = a⁽⁻²⁾⁽⁻³⁾ · b⁽³⁾⁽⁻³⁾ = a⁶b⁻⁹. Denominator: (a⁴b⁻²)² = a⁸b⁻⁴. Divide by subtracting: a⁶⁻⁸ = a⁻², and b⁻⁹⁻⁽⁻⁴⁾ = b⁻⁵. So the result is a⁻²b⁻⁵ = 1/(a²b⁵). Check at a = 2, b = 1: numerator (2⁻²)⁻³ = (1/4)⁻³ = 64, denominator (2⁴)² = 256, and 64/256 = 1/4 — which is 1/(2² · 1⁵). ✓
- Ba²b⁵
This reaches a⁻²b⁻⁵ correctly and then drops the negative signs when converting to a fraction-free form, as though a negative exponent could simply be discarded. a⁻²b⁻⁵ is the reciprocal of a²b⁵, not equal to it. At a = 2, b = 1 this gives 4 while the expression's actual value is 1/4 — the two are reciprocals, which is the signature of this error.
- C1/(a²b¹³)
The powers are computed correctly — a⁶b⁻⁹ over a⁸b⁻⁴ — and then the b-exponents are added on the division instead of subtracted: −9 + (−4) = −13 rather than −9 − (−4) = −5. The a-exponent happens to survive because 6 − 8 and the intended operation coincide in sign here, which is exactly why the error hides.
- D1/a¹¹
This adds the exponents at the power-of-a-power step instead of multiplying: (a⁻²b³)⁻³ read as a⁻²⁺⁽⁻³⁾b³⁺⁽⁻³⁾ = a⁻⁵b⁰, and (a⁴b⁻²)² read as a⁶b⁰, giving a⁻⁵/a⁶ = a⁻¹¹. The vanishing of b entirely is the tell — a legitimate simplification here cannot eliminate b, since the b-exponents do not cancel.
Traps tested: Dropped negative exponent · Add when dividing · Exponent op swap
Up next
Nonlinear equations and systems
Quadratics by every route, the discriminant, and the extraneous solutions squaring invents.
32 min